HL HeatNet — Part L 2026 Navigator

REV 2.8
BASIS ADL1+ADL2 2026 · PUB 24 MAR 2026
EFFECTIVE 24 MAR 2027 · HRB 24 SEP 2027
Worked examples
Section 1

Project

District: supplies consumers in two or more buildings from central source(s) through a pipe network. Communal: supplies heating, cooling or hot water only within a single building divided into separate premises. Ambient loop: sub-50°C shared source with unit heat pumps. Classify on the legal / building-control building boundary, not on block or address counts — this decision fixes the pathway.
Leeds, Plymouth, Bristol, Stockport, Sheffield and two London schemes were announced as pilot / advanced-development schemes — not automatically designated zones. Only formal designation triggers connection requirements for new buildings; earlier statuses warrant early engagement.
Sleeving eligibility is determined by the eligible-energy numerator and calculated percentage in Section 2, not by this contextual selection. Only Table 1.2 types can count in that numerator: electrically powered heat pumps, waste heat, geothermal, electric boilers, solar thermal, biofuels.
Section 2

Sleeving declaration ADL1 1.8–1.9

Only district heat networks can be sleeved — communal networks cannot 1.8 NOTE. The declaration is made to building control by the body operating the network.
Declaration inputs apply when sleeving is claimed on a district network. They are inactive for the current selection.
Enter the three figures above — network share of demand and the eligible-capacity share are computed from this auditable balance. At least 90% of the network-delivered energy must be eligible.
Up to 10% of the network-delivered energy may come from non-qualifying plant — a 92% heat-pump / 8% gas allocation passes. What must be pure is the eligible numerator itself: exclude any non-Table 1.2 energy from the kWh figure above.
"Yes" is a hard fail — the same capacity cannot support two declarations.
The contract is mandatory for future capacity; planning permission applies only where required.

Compliance pathway

Interpretation

What this means

Director summary

Profile

    How these scores are assessed

    Scores are ordinal (1–5) and derived from the live result, not fixed opinions. Complexity scales with the breadth of the evidence register for the current pathway. Evidence burden scales with the count of items still to obtain, verify or close. Attention rating starts at 1 and adds a weighted point per named driver listed above — declaration gaps +3, network-factor exposure and declaration reliance +2, procedural items +1 — capped at 5. It is an indicative screening score generated by the navigator; it is not a statutory, insurance, cost or programme risk rating.

    Evidence & declaration register

    Clause basis and live status

    ItemClauseStatus
    No items match this filter for the current pathway.